All posts from September 9, 2008
Vede signor Ministro »
Esistono i morti.
/personale. ho dato un’occhiata al mio archivio per averne conferma: non “parlo” di politica, qui sopra, da mesi. secondo le mie categorie di giudizio dovrebbe essere una cosa positiva: sono abbastanza focalizzata su me stessa da non aver bisogno di proiezioni o fughe; ma potrebbe invece darsi che io abbia esaurito le forze mentali per dedicarmi a qualsiasi cosa che non sia puro e glorioso escapismo. onestamente, penso che la seconda interpretazione sia quella giusta…
“Schema dei partiti che hanno portato alla nascita del Pd”
ahahah! c’è qualcuno che ha inteso male il principio dei vasi comunicanti!
ma scusate!!!!si legge OVUNQUE ke i Take That sn gli eredi dei beatles dal punto di vista delle vendite!!!e poi,care mie,se i take that nn soni degni dei beatles cm mai i take c sn ankora e i beatles no? nn tirate fuori la storia ke sn vekki xkè cm c sn ankora i rolling stones ci potrebbero exere ankora snz problemi anke loro….
bennina (love love me)
/commenti da Le Malvestite/
“tempo di lettura cinque minuti”: più altri due tre per toglierti dalla testa l’ansia rimbombante “mio dio perché sto leggendo questa cosa?”
non chiedetemi come e perché, ma sono tre-quattro giorni che ho in testa questa sigla.
“The theory of childhood, also known as child origin, is a damnable, loathsome and indefensible lie. How can any thinking person suppose all humans used to be babies once? There is no development path from babies to adults, no transitional forms between these two species. Show me even one baby with the head of a grown man on his body. Can you? No? Not even a bearded toddler? No adults with unfused skullbones, outside unfortunate disorders? Not even a tiny little newborn girl suddenly sprouting a respectable bosom? You can’t find them, because they don’t exist. There isn’t a single transitional form between children and adults, and you will never find one because the theory simply is an unscientific lie.
The development of children has been well-researched in our six-month study following a sample of one thousand children and adults of various ages. We have conclusively proven that while there are minor changes in features like height and body fat, and replacement of deciduous teeth with permanent teeth, incontravertibly still every creature in the study that started out as a child had only slightly more adult features at the end of the observation period than at its beginning. Children and adults are separate kinds and there will never be sufficient changes to change one into the other. We reject any evidence from longer-term studies as we believe the laws of physics have changed within the last year.
To claim people come from children is demeaning and morally degrading. We have observed how children behave. If we acted like small children we’d all be demanding and impatient, and we’d be cheating, lying, and stealing from each other all the time. If the theory of childhood were true there would be no morality, and with no morality to build one on, no society. Childhood is a wicked lie used by charlatans to justify evils such as public schools.
There is no consensus on the theory of childhood in the scientific community. We should teach the controversy. Our children will be served well to learn that the prospect of them becoming adults is merely a theoretical idea. Many children come from families that do not subscribe to the theory of childhood, and they could be disturbed if the theory were taught as fact.”
» nuoce gravemente alla salute | 2+2=5 »
(è che proprio non sapevo quale parte del post scegliere)
spineless è sempre lui
